BM Kumar
College of Forestry, Kerala Agricultural University, KAU PO, Thrissur 680 656, Kerala, India (email: bmkumar.kau@gmail.com; bmkumar@ufl.edu)
Abstract This paper outlines certain ideas of forest conservation and sustainable management ingrained in pre-historic India. Apparently, both productive as well as protective aspects of forest vegetation were emphasized during the Vedic period (~ 4500 and 1800 BC; c. 8000-1000 BC - eds.). In particular, the religious texts such as Aranyakas ("forest" works), Upanishad, and Smritis contain many descriptions on the uses and management of forests, and highlight sustainability as an implicit theme. According to the Vedic traditions, every village will attain wholeness only when certain types of forests are present. Some of these are, however, equivalent to the 'protected areas' and 'production forests' of today. The concept of participatory forest management, an important forest management paradigm today, also was prevalent in ancient India, as illustrated by the example of a village committee overseeing the maintenance of forests. During the late Vedic period (c. 500 BC; 1000 BC - eds.) with the emergence of agriculture as the dominant economic activity, the concept of cultural landscapes such as sacred forests and groves, sacred corridors, and a variety of ethnoforestry practices evolved, which continued into the post-Vedic period (c. 1000 to 200 BC). The Himalayas since Vedic times also have been home for an array of medicinal plants and other resources. Furthermore, several Indian trees and shrubs were regarded as sacred because of their medicinal/aesthetic/natural qualities as well as their proximity to a particular deity. Religion was probably used in ancient India as a tool to protect nature and natural resources and several instances of worshiping the trees have been reported from different parts of the country, besides a wide range of ethnoforestry practices. All these probably highlight the conservation ethos of ancient Indian people.
Despite the prevailing notion that forestry as a "science" and "practice" originated in the Western Europe and further advanced in North America (Lewis, 2005), the principles of forest conservation and sustainable management were well entrenched in the pre-historic India. Forestry traditions have been documented in the religious texts of this country for long. For example, the Vedas (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vedas; last accessed on 11 February 2008) contain several descriptions on the uses and management of forests. Although no consensus on when the Vedas were cognized, the timeline of Vedic civilization, which gave rise to these scriptures, is thought to be between 4500 and 1800 BC (http://www.haryana-online.com/History/vedic_culture.htm; last accessed on 12 February 2008; 8000-1000 BC - eds.). Starting with the days of Vedas and extending into the post-Vedic and Puranic times (200 BC to 100 AD) (http://www.ejvs.laurasianacademy.com/ejvs1006/1006.txt; last accessed on 8 February 2008), environment consciousness, besides natural resource and biodiversity conservation, were intrinsic features of Hindu religious rituals and practices. Both productive as well as protective aspects of forest vegetation were emphasized in Vedic forestry. Some glimpses of production, conservation, and management of forests in India during the Vedic period, late Vedic period, and the Puranic periods are unraveled here.
Vedas or "the Books of Knowledge"
Vedas are the sacred Sanskrit texts of Hinduism. According to some scholars, the great sage Ved Vyasa (Fig. 1) codified and put the Vedas into writing at the beginning of Kali Yuga (3102 BC) (http://www.encyclopediaofauthentichinduism.org/articles/51_the_bhartiya_chronology.htm; last accessed on 8 February 2008). These are the Shruti Vedas, which include: Rig Veda (Wisdom of the Verses), Sama Veda (Wisdom of the Chants), Yajur Veda (Wisdom of the Sacrificial Formulas), and Atharva Veda (Wisdom of the Atharvan Priests). Initially, the Shruti Vedas consisted of four collections of mantras (Samhitas), each associated with a particular priest or aspect of ritual. Over centuries, three kinds of additional literature were attached to each of the Samhitas: the Brahmanas (discussions of the ritual), Aranyakas (books studied in the forest), and Upanishads or the philosophical writings (Bloomfield, 1908; Witzel, 2003).
Of these, Aranyakas or the "forest" works (aranya in Sanskrit means 'forest' and aranyaka means 'in the forest') and the Upanishad 'Brhadaranyaka' (translated as "Great Forest Text") are particularly important from the perspective of forestry traditions (Pande, 1994; Keith, 2005; Witzel, 2005). Aranyakas in general discussed the rites deemed 'not suitable' for the village. In other words, these are treatises for sadhus or vanaprasthas [third spiritual stage (asrama) in the varnasrama system: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanaprastha; last accessed on 8 February 2008] living in the wilderness as hermits experimenting with detachment from material life. Although aranyakas provide the theological foundations of early Hinduism, which is outside the realm of forestry, some of these descriptions are relevant to indigenous ecological knowledge, on which there is considerable interest now (e.g., Gadgil et al., 1998; Folke, 2004). Attempts have been also made recently to evaluate the cultural values as a social mechanism behind the traditional practices (Berkes et al., 2000). Smriti Vedas or the Vedas for Kali Yuga constitute another branch of Hindu religious literature. It includes the two epic poems: Mahabharata (composed by sage Ved Vyasa) and Ramayana (composed by sage Valmiki), besides the many Puranas; all these contain umpteen references to forests. According to these, the land originally was under tree cover, but as the human settlements expanded, trees were cleared to make way for cultivation. The legend is that King Prithu milked the earth (Prithvi) in the form of a cow (Shri Mad-Bhaagvat Jee, Skandh 4: Chapters 17-18), signifying the start of agriculture. Prithu is also credited with the feat of clearing forests and establishing the organized agricultural settlements and townships.
Nature conservation ethos in ancient India
Sustainability was ingrained in the thought processes of early Indians as evident from the teachings of Vedas. For example, the Atharva Veda (Chand, 1997) hymn 12.1.11 reads: "O Earth! Pleasant be thy hills, snow-clad mountains and forests; O numerous coloured, firm and protected Earth! On this earth I stand, undefeated, unslain, unhurt." Another hymn from Atharva Veda (12.1.35) reads: "Whatever I dig out from you, O Earth! May that have quick regeneration again; may we not damage thy vital habitat and heart."
Forests and forestry during the Vedic and late Vedic periods
The Vedic traditions affirm that every village will be complete only when certain categories of forest vegetation or trees (e.g., Mahavan, Shrivan, and Tapovan) are preserved in and around its territory (Prime, 2002). Of these, Mahavan, or 'the great natural forest', is perhaps equivalent to the 'protected areas' of today; it adjoins the village and provides a place where all species can coexist. Once some of the original forest was cleared, the Vedic culture also necessitated that another kind of forest be established in its place (Banwari, 2002 in Prime, 2002). This is equivalent to today's "production forests" and it provides the essential goods and services to humans and livestock (e.g., fodder, timber, roots, and herbs, besides maintaining soil fertility, air and water quality as well as providing shelter). Traditionally, these are called Shrivan or the 'forest of prosperity' or 'forest of wealth'. The Shrivan could be in the form of monospecific stands (plantations) or species mixtures (agroforests). The third category of forests is Tapovan, or the 'forest of religion' - the home of sages. Being sacred, no animal or tree could be harmed in these forests. This kind of forest is natural and untended, but is specifically set aside as a place for the practice of religion. During the Vedic age, each village was also responsible through its panchayat, or committee of five elders, for maintaining the forests in its own territory (Banwari, 2002 in Prime, 2002). Implicit in this is the concept of participatory forest management, which forms a main component of the forest management paradigm today. Also, no village would be complete without its woodlands in and around the houses. Every village also must have a cluster of five great trees; panchavati symbolizing the five primary elements: earth, water, fire, air, and 'ether' - the totality of everything. The shift from early to later Vedic period also signified the emergence of agriculture as the dominant economic activity with a corresponding decline in cattle rearing. The late Vedic period from c. 500 BC (c. 1000 BC - eds.) also merges smoothly with the period of the Middle kingdoms (230 BC-1279 AD). Numerous descriptions of trees and groves exemplifying the bond between Indian people and trees are available in the writings from this period. Varahamihira's Brhat Samhita (c. 700 AD; Bhat, 1981), which describes the relationships between irrigation tanks and trees, is probably the most important in this respect. Varahamihira provided detailed technical instructions on tank construction and prescription on species to be planted on the embankments. According to him, the shoreline (banks) of the tanks should be shaded (planted) with the mixed stands of Terminalia arjuna (arjun), Ficus benghalensis (banyan), Mangifera indica (mango), Ficus religiosa (pipal), Nauclea orientalis, Syzygium cumini (Java plum), Mitragyna parvifolia, Borassus flabellifer (palmyra palm), Saraca asoka (Asoka tree), Madhuca indica (mahua), Mimusops elengi (Spanish cherry), among others (54.119). Agriculture by Parashara (Krishi-Parashara; 400 BC) (Sadhale, 1999); Laws of Manu or Manusmriti (c. 200 BC-200 AD); The Epic of Fire or Agni Purana compiled c. 700 or 800 AD; A Treatise on Agriculture by Kashyapa (Kashyapiya-krishisukti; c. 800 AD) (Ayachit, 2002); The Science of Plant Life by Surapala (Surapala's Vrikshayurveda; c. 1000 AD) (Sadhale, 1996) are some of the relevant texts from that era.
Asian Agri-History Foundation (AAHF)
College of Agriculture
GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar-263145
U S Nagar, Uttarakhand, INDIA
Mobile No.: +91 88590 20329
+91 76686 41574
Website: www.asianagrihistory.org
Email: asianagrihistory94@gmail.com
Designed & Developed By: Webtech Softwares Pvt. Ltd.
Copyright © 2015-2020 ASIAN Agri-History Foundation.